Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 17(5): e0267506, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1841151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In COVID-19 patients, lung ultrasound is superior to chest radiograph and has good agreement with computerized tomography to diagnose lung pathologies. Most lung ultrasound protocols published to date are complex and time-consuming. We describe a new illustrative Point-of-care ultrasound Lung Injury Score (PLIS) to help guide the care of patients with COVID-19 and assess if the PLIS would be able to predict COVID-19 patients' clinical course. METHODS: This retrospective study describing the novel PLIS was conducted in a large tertiary-level hospital. COVID-19 patients were included if they required any form of respiratory support and had at least one PLIS study during hospitalization. Data collected included PLIS on admission, demographics, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and patient outcomes. The primary outcome was the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients and 293 PLIS studies were included in our analysis. The mean age was 60.9, and overall mortality was 18.3%. Median PLIS score was 5.0 (3.0-6.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0-3.0) in ICU and non-ICU patients respectively (p<0.001). Total PLIS scores were directly associated with SOFA scores (inter-class correlation 0.63, p<0.001), and multivariate analysis showed that every increase in one PLIS point was associated with a higher risk for ICU admission (O.R 2.09, 95% C.I 1.59-2.75) and in-hospital mortality (O.R 1.54, 95% C.I 1.10-2.16). CONCLUSIONS: The PLIS for COVID-19 patients is simple and associated with SOFA score, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed to demonstrate whether the PLIS can improve outcomes and become an integral part of the management of COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Point-of-Care Systems , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Med Virol ; 94(1): 417-423, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1439701

ABSTRACT

A 36-year-old male with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on maintenance rituximab therapy presented to the emergency department with high fever and fatigue. A chest X-ray showed a lobar infiltrate, 40 days before admission the patient suffered from a mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and fully recovered. PCR nasopharyngeal swab was negative for COVID-19. Comprehensive biochemical, radiological, and pathological evaluation including 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography and transbronchial lung biopsy found no pathogen or lymphoma recurrence. Treatment for pneumonia with antibiotic and antifungal agents was nonbeneficial. A diagnosis of secondary organizing pneumonia (OP) was made after pneumonia migration and a rapid response to corticosteroids. OP secondary to a viral respiratory infection has been well described. Raising awareness for post-COVID-19 OP has therapeutic and prognostic importance because those patients benefit from steroid therapy. We believe the condition described here is underdiagnosed and undertreated by doctors worldwide. Because of the ongoing global pandemic we are now encountering a new kind of patient, patients that have recovered from COVID-19. We hope that this case may contribute to gaining more knowledge about this growing patient population.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , COVID-19/therapy , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia/diagnosis , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia/drug therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia/pathology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Male , Nasopharynx/virology , Positron-Emission Tomography , Rituximab/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Med Ethics ; 46(7): 444-446, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-46239

ABSTRACT

The novel COVID-19 pandemic has placed medical triage decision-making in the spotlight. As life-saving ventilators become scarce, clinicians are being forced to allocate scarce resources in even the wealthiest countries. The pervasiveness of air travel and high rate of transmission has caused this pandemic to spread swiftly throughout the world. Ethical triage decisions are commonly based on the utilitarian approach of maximising total benefits and life expectancy. We present triage guidelines from Italy, USA and the UK as well as the Jewish ethical prospective on medical triage. The Jewish tradition also recognises the utilitarian approach but there is disagreement between the rabbis whether human discretion has any role in the allocation of scarce resources and triage decision-making.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Care Rationing/ethics , Jews/psychology , Judaism/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Triage/ethics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Clinical Protocols/standards , Humans , Morals , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Standard of Care/ethics , Ventilators, Mechanical/supply & distribution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL